Kopum\u0101 luga ir\ninteresanta un to b\u016btu der\u012bgi iestud\u0113t, ja skatuviskas iedz\u012bvin\u0101\u0161anas gait\u0101\nvis\u0101m \u0161aj\u0101 m\u0101kslinieciskaj\u0101 projekt\u0101 iesaist\u012btaj\u0101m person\u0101m izdotos atrisin\u0101t vair\u0101kus\nneskaidrus jaut\u0101jumus, kurus t\u0101l\u0101k iez\u012bm\u0113\u0161u, k\u0101 problem\u0101tiskus, bet neb\u016bt ne\nt\u0101dus, kas r\u0101d\u012btos gal\u012bgi neatrisin\u0101mi \u0161\u012b pa\u0161a materi\u0101la robe\u017e\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Pirmais, par ko man bija j\u0101dom\u0101, tas ir \u017eanra jaut\u0101jums \u2013 psiholo\u0123iskai tra\u0123ikom\u0113dijai \u0161\u0137iet p\u0101r\u0101k maz piev\u0113rsta uzman\u012bba tie\u0161i psiholo\u0123ijas jaut\u0101jumiem (detaliz\u0113t\u0101k tiks p\u0113t\u012bts t\u0101l\u0101k), v\u0113sturiskai dr\u0101mai \u2013 v\u0113sturisko elementu. Un tad noteikti j\u0101jaut\u0101 \u2013 k\u0101p\u0113c tie\u0161i \u0161\u012bs v\u0113stures skat\u012bjums interesants \u0161olaiku cilv\u0113kam (vai tikai at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgas seksualit\u0101tes izpratnes jaut\u0101jum\u0101, t\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 par maz sal\u012bdzin\u0101juma, vai t\u0101da pavisam nav \u2013 bie\u017ei vien r\u0101d\u0101s, ka \u0161ie devi\u0146padsmit\u0101 gadsimta s\u0101kuma \u013caudis sprie\u017e un r\u012bkojas jau nu p\u0101rlieku \u201em\u016bsdien\u012bgi\u201d), t\u0101pat materi\u0101la pamaz ar\u012b simboliskai vai pat sirre\u0101l\u0101 gaisotn\u0113 ievirz\u012btai izr\u0101dei, jo r\u0101d\u0101s par maz paradoks\u0101lu t\u0113lu, bezapzi\u0146as sap\u0146u t\u0113lu (vai tml.) un darb\u012bbas att\u012bst\u012bbas tie\u0161i p\u0101rsteiguma virzien\u0101, jo iesp\u0113jo p\u0113d\u0113jo paradigmu (simbolisma, romantisma, sirre\u0101lisma u.c. modernistiski skat\u012bjumi)\u00a0 uzst\u0101d\u012bjumi radik\u0101li necie\u0161 banalit\u0101tes, kurpretim psiholo\u0123iska p\u0113t\u012bjuma ietvars to var\u0113tu ar\u012b pie\u013caut, ja atrastos negaid\u012bti t\u0113lu uzved\u012bbas un m\u0113\u0137u izv\u0113les risin\u0101jumi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Otrk\u0101rt, kas var\u0113tu\nm\u016bs ieinteres\u0113t no j\u0113gas viedok\u013ca? Vai \u201elibido\u201d, proti seksualit\u0101tes\nproblem\u0101tika? Vai \u0161\u012bs izpausmes aprakstam lietot\u0101 br\u012bv\u0101 leksika? J\u0101, tas nav\nizsl\u0113gts. Bet vai ar to b\u016btu pietiekami, lai atkl\u0101tu interesanto, svar\u012bgo un\nnoz\u012bm\u012bgo? Skaidrs, ka luga nav v\u0113sturisks trakt\u0101ts, taj\u0101 min\u0113t\u0101s atsauces, k\u0101\nremark\u0101s pa\u0161\u0101 s\u0101kum\u0101 un t\u0101l\u0101k, ir p\u0101r\u0101k maz inform\u0101cijas, k\u0101 to realiz\u0113t. Jo\ntas ir svar\u012bgi no atmosf\u0113ras viedok\u013ca. Tas, kas min\u0113ts par salinieku\nvardarb\u012bbas izpausm\u0113m, ka tos vai citus \u201enetikl\u012bbu\u201d piekop\u0113jus var tiklab\nnolin\u010dot, kas b\u016btu viegl\u0101kais variants, k\u0101 ar\u012b sakrop\u013cot un pamest nomirt\nnoasi\u0146ojot. \u0160o baiso fona kopt\u0113lu un t\u0101 att\u012bst\u012bbas perspekt\u012bvas noteikti\nvajadz\u0113tu ekspon\u0113t pa\u0161\u0101 s\u0101kum\u0101 \u2013 izv\u0113rst simbolisk\u0101 ain\u0101, ritu\u0101la sakrop\u013co\u0161ana,\nkur iez\u012bm\u0113tos satrakota p\u016b\u013ca \u0101rpr\u0101ts, kur att\u0113lotos upuru reakcijas utt. Tam\nnav j\u0101b\u016bt natur\u0101lam t\u0113lojumam, ta\u010du nep\u0101rprotamam. Tad m\u0113s saprastu, k\u0101 lugas\nvaro\u0146i risk\u0113 ar savu r\u012bc\u012bbu, tad b\u016btu saprotams ne tikai ar pr\u0101tu, bet saj\u016btu\n(afektu un perceptu) l\u012bmen\u012b, k\u0101p\u0113c Fabi\u0101no j\u0101dab\u016b d\u0113lu prom no salas par katru\ncenu un k\u0101p\u0113c vi\u0146\u0161 pats beig\u0101s iet boj\u0101 nosl\u012bcin\u0101ts. Tas vairotu spriedzi,\nrad\u012btu intrigu, kas tagad izr\u0101dei radik\u0101li pietr\u016bkst, jo nav, k\u0101 saka redzama\n\u201eantagonista\u201d, tas ir \u2013 pretsp\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ja galvenajiem varo\u0146iem \u201eprotagonistiem\u201d ar\nvi\u0146u darb\u012bbas m\u0113r\u0137iem un att\u012bst\u012bbas l\u012bnij\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tre\u0161k\u0101rt, b\u016btu\nnepiecie\u0161amas prec\u012bz\u0101kas nor\u0101des uz katra person\u0101\u017ea psiholo\u0123isko portret\u0113jumu,\nlai tie b\u016btu tie\u0161\u0101m at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgi, lai nevain\u012bgie r\u012bkotos k\u0101 nevain\u012bgie, lai skopie\npa savam, vai tikl\u012bbas fan\u0101ti\u0137i p\u0113c savas p\u0101rliec\u012bbas, bet sp\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ji atkal pa\nsavam utt. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113 r\u016bp\u0113ties, lai katrs tip\u0101\u017es ir uzskat\u0101mi at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgs. T\u0101tad:\nlai visi nedarbojas p\u0113c l\u012bdz\u012bgiem vadmot\u012bviem, lai galu gal\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101s nerea\u0123\u0113\nkaut k\u0101 tipveida, vien\u0101 paraug\u0101, kas gal\u012bgi nav ticams pusl\u012bdz re\u0101li veidot\u0101\nsi\u017eet\u0101 un padara person\u0101\u017eus par \u201edz\u012bvaj\u0101m lell\u0113m\u201d, t\u0101pat b\u016btu j\u0101atrod\nat\u0161\u0137ir\u012bbas ar\u012b izmantot\u0101s leksikas zi\u0146\u0101, lai visi nerun\u0101 form\u0101li vien\u0101di\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T\u0101l\u0101k ie\u0161u pa ain\u0101m\nun konkretiz\u0113\u0161u augst\u0101k min\u0113tos iebildumus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tiek ekspon\u0113ts sav\u0101 saimniec\u0113 ieskat\u012bjies kalps Klauss, kur\u0161 turkl\u0101t ir tik \u012bpatn\u0113ji kari\u0137\u0113ts (dzer pu\u0137\u016bdeni), ka rodas interese<\/em><\/strong> par vi\u0146a t\u0113la att\u012bst\u012bbu, kas v\u0113l\u0101k netiek turpin\u0101ta. L\u012bnija apraujas. (Maldin\u0101jums no ekspoz\u012bcijas viedok\u013ca \u2013 interesei, kas rad\u012bta ir noteikti j\u0101att\u012bst\u0101s, jo\u00a0 pret\u0113j\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 no uztv\u0113r\u0113ja, proti, las\u012bt\u0101ja, skat\u012bt\u0101ja viedok\u013ca notiek percepta baiass, tas ir: sist\u0113miska uztveres k\u013c\u016bda).<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0160is uzst\u0101d\u012bjums it k\u0101\nnor\u0101da, ka luga att\u012bst\u012bsies karikat\u016bras stil\u0101 (piem\u0113ram: farss, sirre\u0101la,\nsimbolistiska pieeja utt.) Tom\u0113r t\u0101l\u0101kaj\u0101 gait\u0101 notikumi att\u012bst\u0101s zin\u0101mas\nv\u0113sturiskas realit\u0101tes ietvaros, kur iracion\u0101l\u0101 stilistika vairs netiek dro\u0161i\nuztur\u0113ta\u2026 Pat ne kom\u0113dijas gar\u0161\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Te tiek ekspon\u0113tas\nkaimi\u0146u \u0137engas. Par ko tad \u0137eng\u0101jas kaimi\u0146i? Intriga gan uzst\u0101d\u012bta, bet\u2026 Tie\u0161i\nt\u0101pat \u2013 l\u012bnija\natkal apraujas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Svar\u012bgs ir tikai ekspoz\u012bcijas materi\u0101ls \u2013 Ulrika ir m\u0101te un \u201esieva\u201d abiem galvenajiem varo\u0146iem, bet mums b\u016bs j\u0101gaida l\u012bdz lugas beig\u0101m, kam\u0113r \u0161is uzst\u0101d\u012bjums izr\u0101d\u012bsies noder\u012bgs (un man \u0161\u0137iet, ka jau b\u016bs \u013coti daudzu skat\u012bt\u0101ju aizmirsts). To der\u0113tu v\u0113l atg\u0101din\u0101t vair\u0101kas reizes, t\u0101tad Ulrikai vajadz\u0113tu savu att\u012bst\u012bbas l\u012bniju, piem\u0113ram, skopuma l\u012bniju \u2013 grib\u0113tu gan aizs\u016bt\u012bt naudu saviem \u201ed\u0113lam un v\u012bram\u201d, bet \u017e\u0113l, un atkal tiek atrasti da\u017e\u0101di attaisnojumi, k\u0101p\u0113c to nedar\u012bt: 1.skat\u0101 \u2013 \u201ev\u0113l\u0101k pag\u016b\u0161u\u201d, bet var\u0113tu ar\u012b, piem\u0113ram: audzin\u0101\u0161anas nol\u016bkos \u2013 lai lab\u0101k d\u0113ls \u201enor\u016bd\u0101s nabadz\u012bb\u0101\u201d, lai iem\u0101c\u0101s pats peln\u012bt. Tikpat labi, saimnieciski mot\u012bvi, \u012bsti vai sadom\u0101ti \u2013 \u201ekr\u012bze tuvojas, j\u0101dz\u012bvo taup\u012bg\u0101k\u201d. Un t\u0101 t\u0101l\u0101k.<\/p>\n\n\n\n V\u0113l j\u0101padom\u0101, k\u0101 z\u012bm\u012bg\u0101k t\u0113lot darb\u012bbas vietas. Protams, var jau teikt \u2013 lai re\u017eisors par to dom\u0101, bet varb\u016bt vi\u0146am var pal\u012bdz\u0113t. Teiksim, lai Klauss te sulai\u0146a, te zvejnieka t\u0113l\u0101 iznes priek\u0161pl\u0101n\u0101 z\u012bm\u012bgus simbolus Ulrikas m\u0101jai v\u0101ciski zelt\u012bt\u0101 \u0113rg\u013ca statuju vai vismaz bildi (k\u0101 izk\u0101rtni pie m\u0101jas, teiksim), bet, ja krog\u0101, tad attiec\u012bgu simboliku \u2013 izripina alus mucu, ar\u012b uzliek \u201ekli\u0146\u0123era\u201d tipa izk\u0101rtni utt. Vai Kazanovas b\u016bdai to pa\u0161u asi\u0146aino tru\u0161a galvu un taml\u012bdz\u012bgi (te pat nav svar\u012bgi, ka \u201etru\u0161a galva par\u0101d\u0101s \u201epar agru\u201d jau s\u0101kuma skatos, jo nek\u0101di nepaskaidrota t\u0101 rada papildus interesi \u201ek\u0101p\u0113c t\u0101ds simbols\u201d, kura \u012bst\u0101 j\u0113ga atkl\u0101sies v\u0113l\u0101k, kad tas b\u016bs nepiecie\u0161ams p\u0113c darb\u012bbas).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Darb\u012bbas vieta pie\nSilvijas t\u0113va m\u0101jas b\u016btu j\u0101iek\u0101rto ar vardarb\u012bbas simboliku, t\u0101m pa\u0161\u0101m\nasi\u0146ainaj\u0101m \u0161\u0137\u0113r\u0113m. Lai rad\u012btu tie\u0161\u0101m b\u012bstamu atmosf\u0113ru, b\u016btu pat vajadz\u012bgs\nk\u0101ds vardarb\u012bbas skats, jo tikai par to ierakst\u012bt programmi\u0146\u0101 vai remark\u0101 ir\npar maz \u2013 to nevar uztvert skat\u012bt\u0101js, vi\u0146am svar\u012bg\u0101k\u0101s lietas j\u0101uzliek uz\nskatuves \u2013 tas ir likums numur viens. Lai rad\u012btu spriedzi, lai m\u0113s skat\u012bt\u0101ji\nsaprastu, k\u0101 \u0161ie person\u0101\u017ei visi bez iz\u0146\u0113muma risk\u0113 ar sav\u0101m attiec\u012bb\u0101m sadusmot\nsoci\u0101lo vidi \u2013 viet\u0113jo vardarb\u012bgo sabiedr\u012bbu, kura pie vajadz\u012bbas nekav\u0113sies\nizmantot radik\u0101lus l\u012bdzek\u013cus savai \u201elin\u010da tiesai\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tad ar\u012b j\u0101p\u0101rdom\u0101, k\u0101 Fabi\u0101no run\u0101 ar Sellu, k\u0101 vi\u0146i mask\u0113 savus nodomus no citiem. Vai tad to dr\u012bkst dzird\u0113t krodziniece? Nek\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 \u2013 te b\u016btu nep\u0101rprotami n\u0101ves draudi \u2013 atkl\u0101t \u0161\u0101das inform\u0101cijas saturu \u201eviet\u0113jiem lin\u010dot\u0101jiem\u201d. Fabi\u0101no no izdz\u012bvo\u0161anas instinkta viedok\u013ca nedr\u012bkst b\u016bt tik nepiesardz\u012bgs! Vai ar\u012b, ja vi\u0146\u0161 risk\u0113, tad j\u0101zina, k\u0101p\u0113c risk\u0113, vi\u0146\u0161 ta\u010du nav nek\u0101ds naivulis, bet pieredz\u0113jis sp\u0113lmanis! Tad to j\u0101skaidro tie\u0161i k\u0101d\u0101 ain\u0101. Risk\u0113ju t\u0101p\u0113c, ka apriebusies dz\u012bve \u2013 faktiski, pa\u0161n\u0101v\u012bba, risk\u0113ju, lai dab\u016btu prom d\u0113lu, kam draud izr\u0113\u0137in\u0101\u0161an\u0101s no viet\u0113jo puses \u2013 utt. \u0160\u012bm motiv\u0101cij\u0101m k\u0101dos apst\u0101k\u013cos j\u0101izskan skaidr\u0101k, nep\u0101rprotam\u0101k. Cit\u0101di tiek ekspon\u0113tas maz\u0101k svar\u012bgas satura noz\u012bmes, bet \u0161\u012bs \u2013 b\u016btisk\u0101s neatt\u012bstas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tiek ekspon\u0113ta Silvijas dziesmi\u0146a, kur\u0101 da\u017es teksts nav \u0101tri uztverams, tikai p\u0101rdom\u0101jot var atkost. Piem\u0113ram, cit\u0101ts:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Vai t\u0101d\u0113\u013c plivin\u0101ja – Malkas b\u016bda galvi\u0146\u0101?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n P\u0113c\np\u0101rdom\u0101\u0161anas var saprast, k\u0101 \u201elibido\u201d, proti, neizlietot\u0101 seksu\u0101l\u0101 ener\u0123ija,\nkas arvien un da\u017e\u0101dos veidos \u201epiesak\u0101s\u201d cilv\u0113ka apzi\u0146\u0101 k\u0101 izt\u0113les, intu\u012bcijas,\nm\u0113r\u0137a izv\u0113les utt. saj\u016btu t\u0113li un dom\u0101jumi (afekti\nun percepti<\/em>). Tom\u0113r izr\u0101des apst\u0101k\u013cos tas iesp\u0113jams b\u016btu neuztverami, ja to\nspeci\u0101li neizsp\u0113l\u0113 ar skatuviskiem l\u012bdzek\u013ciem (iesp\u0113jams, tas b\u016btu re\u017eisora\nzi\u0146\u0101).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sp\u0113le ar \u010diekuru me\u0161anu b\u016btu viet\u0101, jo raksturo Albert\u012bno k\u0101 kautr\u012bgo, rakstura \u012bpa\u0161\u012bba, kas tom\u0113r neattaisnojas t\u0101l\u0101kaj\u0101 darb\u012bb\u0101. Te svar\u012bgi prec\u012bzi iez\u012bm\u0113t, kas ir Albert\u012bno kautr\u012bbas iemesls un k\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 to p\u0101rvar. Vai tas ir t\u0113va (Fabiano) apm\u0101c\u012bbu rezult\u0101ts \u2013 interesanti b\u016btu: k\u0101da ir \u0161\u012bs apm\u0101c\u012bbas gaita? Tikai run\u0101\u0161ana, st\u0101st\u012b\u0161ana par saviem piedz\u012bvojumiem, atsauk\u0161an\u0101s uz sen\u010du \u201eg\u0113nu mantojumu\u201d? Maz ticams\u2026 Kautr\u012bbu t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 psiholo\u0123iski diez vai var iem\u0101c\u012bt p\u0101rvar\u0113t, dr\u012bz\u0101k otr\u0101di\u2026 Jo kautr\u012bgais p\u0113c psiholo\u0123isk\u0101s dabas likuma tie\u0161i no\u0161\u0137ir sevi no citiem un t\u0101p\u0113c nevar vienk\u0101r\u0161i t\u0101pat sekot paraugam. Te j\u0101b\u016bt k\u0101dam citam p\u0101rvar\u0113\u0161anas iemeslam: autoram v\u0113rts p\u0101rdom\u0101t \u2013 iesp\u0113jam\u0101s versijas, (s\u0101kot ar t\u0101m, ko es izmantotu \u0161\u012b t\u0113la att\u012bst\u012bb\u0101), pirmk\u0101rt, bailes tikt v\u0113l vair\u0101k pazemotam, protests pret t\u0113va \u201eaizliegumu\u201d. Bet tad t\u0113vs m\u0101c\u012btu vi\u0146u nevis tie\u0161\u0101 ce\u013c\u0101, bet gan aizliedzot, lai rad\u012btu \u201eprotestu\u201d \u2013 iedom\u0101jos, ka t\u0101dam psihes sp\u0113lmanim, k\u0101dam ir j\u0101b\u016bt \u201ekatram k\u0101rt\u012bgam paved\u0113jam\u201d \u2013 \u0161\u0101ds paradoks\u0101ls apm\u0101c\u012bbas ce\u013c\u0161 b\u016btu gan pa\u0161am, gan las\u012bt\u0101jam interesant\u0101ks \u2013 tas ar\u012b rad\u012btu intrigas l\u012bniju, mostas virkne jaut\u0101jumu, kas ir dramatiskas darb\u012bbas b\u016btisks meh\u0101nisms \u2013 vai paved\u0113js, kas d\u0113lam aizliedz pavest, tikai sp\u0113l\u0113 \u201eaugst\u0101k\u0101s sabiedr\u012bbas\u201d dz\u012bv\u0113 ierastu maskas sp\u0113li, vai ir greizsird\u012bgs, jo pats k\u013c\u016bst \u201epar vecu\u201d, vai ar\u012b \u2013 k\u0101 beig\u0101s izr\u0101d\u012btos, tas ir veids, k\u0101 pa\u0161am piesaist\u012bt Silviju. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Starp\ncitu \u0161\u012b l\u012bnija lug\u0101 ir visinteresant\u0101k\u0101 \u2013 Fabi\u0101no paved Silviju caur to, ka\nvi\u0146a ietekm\u0113 \u0161\u012b pati jaunkundze tiek pa\u0161a d\u0113la pavesta un t\u0101p\u0113c \u201eiez\u012bm\u0113ta\u201d\nviet\u0113j\u0101s sabiedr\u012bbas ac\u012bs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Te\n\u013coti trauc\u0113 t\u0101 ekspoz\u012bcijas da\u013ca, ka jau s\u0101kum\u0101 Silvija pati apgalvo, ka vi\u0146a\n\u201enav ieredz\u0113ta\u201d no tikumisk\u0101 viedok\u013ca (jau ar to vien k\u0101 netiklo sve\u0161zemnieku\napkalpot\u0101ja). <\/p>\n\n\n\n Es\ndar\u012btu tie\u0161i otr\u0101di, padar\u012btu vi\u0146u par soci\u0101l\u0101s vides atz\u012btu jaunavu \u2013 gan\nvi\u0146as rakstura ekspoz\u012bcij\u0101, gan soci\u0101l\u0101s vides attieksmes zi\u0146\u0101 z\u012bm\u0113tu vi\u0146u k\u0101\ntie\u0161i k\u0101 \u201enevainojamu\u201d, iesp\u0113jams, pat k\u0101 \u201ep\u0101r\u0101k tikum\u012bgi audzin\u0101tu\u201d utt.,\ncit\u0101di dramatiskaj\u0101 darb\u012bb\u0101 nenotiek tas, ko Aristotelis sav\u0101 \u201ePo\u0113tik\u0101\u201d ir\nnosaucis par \u201eatpaz\u012b\u0161anu\u201d, respekt\u012bvi, nerodas p\u0101rsteigums, \u201ek\u0101 tad t\u0101\u201d, bija\ntik tikla, izr\u0101d\u0101s \u2013 re, k\u0101\u2026 J\u0101atz\u012bst \u2013 tiesa \u0161\u0101ds risin\u0101jums ir krietni\nbanaliz\u0113ts daudzk\u0101rt\u0113jas izmanto\u0161anas d\u0113\u013c citos sacer\u0113jumos, sevi\u0161\u0137i, seri\u0101los,\ntom\u0113r lab\u0101k t\u0101ds, nek\u0101 nek\u0101ds pav\u0113rsiens \u201euz pret\u0113jo\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Jo, ja nav \u201eatpaz\u012b\u0161anas\u201d, nav \u0161\u0101du \u201epav\u0113rsienu uz pret\u0113jo\u201d tad dramatisk\u0101 darb\u012bba k\u013c\u016bst vienmu\u013ca, vai t\u0101s visp\u0101r iztr\u016bkst\u2026 (ka jau min\u0113ts, to zin\u0101jis jau Aristotelis pirms apm\u0113ram divarpus t\u016bksto\u0161 gadiem). Autoram der\u0113tu padom\u0101t par \u0161\u0101du izv\u0113rsumu \u2013 manis piemin\u0113tais risin\u0101juma veids, protams, nav vien\u012bgais, tikai piem\u0113ra d\u0113\u013c uzskat\u0101m\u0101kais.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Nav\nskaidras motiv\u0101cijas, k\u0101p\u0113c d\u0113ls tie\u0161i \u0161\u012bs sarunas gait\u0101 (kad t\u0101 ievirz\u012bjusies\nvi\u0146am interesant\u0101 gultn\u0113) grib \u0161o virz\u012bbu p\u0101rtraukt un dzird\u0113t no t\u0113va vi\u0146a\nanekdotes, kas pa\u0161as par sevi nav ne sliktas, ne labas, t\u0101s tikai apst\u0101dina\nnotikuma virzienu, t\u0101tad trauc\u0113 no ritma viedok\u013ca, velk s\u0101nis uztveri. Ja d\u0113ls\ngrib\u0113tu izvair\u012bties no t\u0113va \u201epam\u0101c\u012bb\u0101m\u201d, un censtos pagriezt sarunu \u201ecitur\u201d,\ntad \u2013 varb\u016bt\u2026 Bet cit\u0101di \u2013 izskat\u0101s k\u0101 nelo\u0123iski nojaukta darb\u012bba. Albert\u012bno\nb\u016btu ieinteres\u0113ts izzin\u0101t t\u0113va piedz\u012bvojumus un t\u0113vs vair\u012bdamies (vai varb\u016bt\nuzkurin\u0101dams interesi) sl\u0113ptos un pats vilktu sarunu s\u0101nis \u2013 \u201ees tev lab\u0101k izst\u0101st\u012b\u0161u\nto vai citu anekdoti, neprasi par pag\u0101tni!\u201d Tas b\u016btu saprotam\u0101k un lo\u0123isk\u0101k.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Neticami,\nka t\u0113vs d\u0113lam ar savu reakciju \u201eatkl\u0101j k\u0101rtis\u201d \u2013 ka vi\u0146am interes\u0113 Silvija. Tas\nnav gudri un maz ticams. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Ja\nvien tas nav g\u0101jiens, k\u0101 rad\u012bt d\u0113l\u0101 konkurenta garu. Bet<\/em><\/strong> tad t\u0101l\u0101kaj\u0101 lugas\natt\u012bst\u012bbas gait\u0101 b\u016btu j\u0101r\u0101da, k\u0101 \u0161\u012b l\u012bnija att\u012bst\u0101s, k\u0101 Albert\u012bno k\u013c\u016bst par\nradik\u0101li nekaun\u012bgo no s\u0101kotn\u0113ji kautr\u012bg\u0101 \u2013 tie\u0161i t\u0101da Oidipa kompleksa satura\nietvaros \u2013 lai p\u0101rsp\u0113tu t\u0113vu, tas b\u016btu tikai lo\u0123iski.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Kam\u0113r\nAlbert\u012bno un Silvija lugas s\u0101kum\u0101 (pirms gr\u0113k\u0101 kri\u0161anas) ir v\u0113l \u201ekautr\u012bgie\u201d,\nnek\u0101di nevar notic\u0113t vi\u0146u p\u0101r\u0101k jau pieredz\u0113ju\u0161am sarun\u0101m par t\u0113mu, skat,\ncit\u0101ts: \u201eT\u0113vam bija savi izsarg\u0101\u0161an\u0101s pa\u0146\u0113mieni. Ar\u012b p\u0101rtrauktais\ndzimumakts un citronu \u0161\u0137\u0113l\u012btes\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tas ne\u0161\u0137iet lo\u0123iski\nun ar\u012b nojauc m\u016bsu v\u0113l\u0101ko iesp\u0113jamo p\u0101rsteigumu, par to, ka abi tom\u0113r non\u0101k\nattiec\u012bb\u0101s un p\u0101rgu\u013c. Tagad no \u0161\u0101das \u201eiepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101s sarunas\u201d izriet, ka abi ir\ngana pieredz\u0113ju\u0161i, nek\u0101di sevi ierobe\u017eot netais\u0101s un sekss t\u0101du tip\u0101\u017eu starp\u0101\nir pats par sevi saprotams (lai neteiktu jau gaid\u012bts un t\u0101lab garlaic\u012bgs no t\u0101s\npa\u0161as aristotelisk\u0101s \u201eatpaz\u012b\u0161anas\u201d viedok\u013ca).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Te dr\u012bz\u0101k b\u016btu\nj\u0101izsp\u0113l\u0113 abu kautr\u012bgo \u201em\u0101jienus\u201d, \u201eizvair\u012b\u0161anos\u201d, \u201esl\u0113pto simboliku\u201d, cit\u0101di \u2013\nbez \u0161\u0101das paslepenas \u201etaust\u012b\u0161an\u0101s p\u0113c m\u0113r\u0137a\u201d r\u0101d\u0101s kaut k\u0101 neticami, ka abi\nbiju\u0161i tik nevain\u012bgi\u2026 V\u0101rdu sakot, atkal \u2013 ne t\u0101 psiholo\u0123ija\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Visneticam\u0101kais<\/em><\/strong> ir tas, k\u0101 Silvija savam iecer\u0113tajam izpaustu savu\nkompleksu, skat, cit\u0101ts: \u201eMani kop\u0161 mazotnes izsm\u0113ja par l\u012bkaj\u0101m k\u0101j\u0101m,\nvasar\u2019s raibumaino seju un rudo matu koda\u013cu.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0160\u0101dus kompleksa tipa\nsaturus psihe ir tend\u0113ta sl\u0113pt un nogremd\u0113t bezapzi\u0146\u0101, nevis pa\u0161ai to ska\u013ci\nizpaust, turkl\u0101t v\u0113l tam, kuru grib pie sevis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pie\u013caujams, ka vi\u0146a to paustu k\u0101 neirotisku izkliedzienu: \u201ees to pazi\u0146oju, kas mani apkaunojis visu m\u016b\u017eu, jo neticu, ka ar mani k\u0101ds ielaid\u012bsies!\u201d Bet tik dzi\u013ci neirotisks raksturs, kas orient\u0113ts uz tot\u0101lu pa\u0161nolieg\u0161anos, ne par ko neb\u016btu iedab\u016bjams gult\u0101, katr\u0101 zi\u0146a ne tik vienk\u0101r\u0161i, k\u0101 taj\u0101 ain\u0101. Tad b\u016btu j\u0101p\u0101rvar hist\u0113riskie aizliegumi (to princips: \u201eAk, j\u016bs mani pazemojat? Bet j\u016bs nevarat mani pazemot tik dzi\u013ci, k\u0101 es pati sevi vari noliegt!\u201d Tas b\u016btu paradoks\u0101l\u0101s psiholo\u0123ijas g\u0101jiens, k\u0101 pan\u0101kt kontroles iespaidu (es p\u0101rvaldu savu pr\u0101tu), ja nav iesp\u0113jams r\u012bkoties pret\u0113ji aizliegumam, \u0161is aizliegums tiek v\u0113l dubultots un tr\u012bsk\u0101r\u0161ots \u2013 lai tikai rad\u012btu \u201ebr\u012bvas gribas\u201d akciju, sak: \u201ees pati izv\u0113los sevi pazemot tik dzi\u013ci, k\u0101 j\u016bs neviens to nesp\u0113jat). \u0160\u0101da hist\u0113riska reakcija tie\u0161\u0101m b\u016btu rakstur\u012bga 19.gadsimtam, kad ar\u012b psiholo\u0123ij\u0101 rad\u0101s pats hist\u0113rijas j\u0113dziens, tiesa gan v\u0113l\u0101k \u2013 Anglij\u0101 jau p\u0113c pusgadsimta (ja lug\u0101 ietevert\u0101 darb\u012bba notiek 1809.gad\u0101), karalienes Viktorijas vald\u012b\u0161anas laik\u0101, kad sievietes tika tur\u0113tas dzel\u017eain\u0101 pak\u013caut\u012bb\u0101 un korset\u0113s \u201ebez elpas\u201d. Tad ar\u012b nav br\u012bnums, ka \u0161\u0101da apspie\u0161ana rad\u012btu hist\u0113risko \u201ebet es pati sevi varu apspiest v\u0113l ne\u017e\u0113l\u012bg\u0101k”, p\u0113c k\u0101 seko kri\u0161ana zem\u0113, klieg\u0161ana, asaras, l\u012bdz pat rakstos piemin\u0113tajam \u201ehist\u0113riskajam tilti\u0146am\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tom\u0113r \u0161\u012b lugas materi\u0101la ietvaros par Silviju gan neko t\u0101du apgalvot nevar. T\u0101p\u0113c ar\u012b mazvarb\u016bt\u012bgi ticamas ir vi\u0146as un Albert\u012bno sarunas t\u0113mas pirms \u201egr\u0113ko\u0161anas\u201d. To vairums skat\u012bt\u0101ju pe\u010d savas pieredzes uzreiz sajut\u012bs, pat ja da\u017es nevar\u0113s to ar pr\u0101tu aptvert k\u0101 \u201eattiec\u012bbu k\u013c\u016bdu\u201d no realit\u0101tes viedok\u013ca.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Stellas\nun Fabi\u0101no dialogs \u0161\u0137iet saprotams un var notic\u0113t vi\u0146u attiec\u012bb\u0101m \u2013 abi ir\nsve\u0161inieki un tom\u0113r saj\u016bt radnieciskas \u201eapr\u0113\u0137in\u0101t\u0101ju rakstura z\u012bmes\u201d viens\notr\u0101. \u013boti, labi, ka sarunas turpin\u0101jums tiek atlikts uz v\u0113l\u0101ku laiku. Tas rada\nintrigu, kuras tr\u016bkst cit\u0101s ain\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3.ainas\ns\u0101kum\u0101 nav saprotama remarka \u2013 k\u0101 var\u0113tu nosp\u0113l\u0113t t\u0101du inform\u0101ciju, k\u0101 skat\ntekst\u0101: \u201eFabi\u0101no aizs\u016bt\u012bjis d\u0113lu uz att\u0101lo ezeru p\u0113c dzeram\u0101 \u016bdens.\u201d Bet par t\u0101l\u0101ko apv\u0101rdo\u0161anu neb\u016btu pat j\u0101piemin, tas\nnotiek pats par sevi dialoga gait\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bet laba ir t\u0101 att\u012bst\u012bbas gaita, ka Fabi\u0101no izaicina Silviju ielaisties attiec\u012bb\u0101s ar Albert\u012bno\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tiesa, atkal jaut\u0101jums: vai vi\u0146a b\u016bs gatava tikai \u201eform\u0101las at\u013caujas d\u0113\u013c\u201d\u2026 Vai vi\u0146a dr\u012bz\u0101k neuztrauksies pati par sava t\u0113va un ciema \u013cau\u017eu reakcij\u0101m uz vi\u0146a p\u0101rk\u0101pumu \u2013 dom\u0101jams, atg\u0101dinot par sakrop\u013co\u0161anas ritu\u0101la ainu \u2013 to var\u0113tu \u0161aj\u0101 dialog\u0101 v\u0113lreiz cit\u0101d\u0101 form\u0101t\u0101 atst\u0101st\u012bt ar\u012b pati Silvija (un iesp\u0113jams te b\u016btu ar\u012b ritualiz\u0113t\u0101s vardarb\u012bbas fona ainas atg\u0101din\u0101jums, ja \u0161\u0101da aina tiktu s\u0101kum\u0101 izstr\u0101d\u0101ta), lai ir skaidrs, ar ko vi\u0146a risk\u0113 \u0161aj\u0101 soci\u0101laj\u0101 telp\u0101. Tas rad\u012btu spriedzi ar\u012b n\u0101ko\u0161aj\u0101 ain\u0101, kad abi jaunie sagr\u0113kos\u2026 Lai visi skat\u012bt\u0101ji jau\u0161, ar ko vi\u0146i risk\u0113.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fabi\u0101no motiv\u0101cija\nar\u012b b\u016btu j\u0101preciz\u0113. Neb\u016btu slikti skat\u012bt\u0101jiem tie\u0161\u0101k nor\u0101d\u012bt, ka t\u0101 vai cita\nversija ir patiesa:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Par abu nevain\u012bgo\ngr\u0113k\u0101 kri\u0161anu, \u0161\u0137iet b\u016btu j\u0101p\u0101rdom\u0101, cik ticamas ir vi\u0146u darb\u012bbas un k\u0101 tom\u0113r\nvi\u0146i tiek blakus gult\u0101. \u0160\u0137iet, ka \u0161aj\u0101 \u201ekautr\u012bgo\u201d gad\u012bjum\u0101 tam tom\u0113r b\u016btu\nj\u0101notiek spont\u0101n\u0101k, turoties pret\u012b k\u0101rdin\u0101jumam l\u012bdz p\u0113d\u0113jam mirklim, nevis tik\nritmiski vienm\u0113r\u012bgi, k\u0101 tagad, kas liecina dr\u012bz\u0101k par pieredzi l\u012bdz\u012bgos\ngad\u012bjumos\u2026 <\/p>\n\n\n\n N\u0101ko\u0161\u0101 aina, kur\u0101 krodziniece un grib\u0113tos dom\u0101t \u2013 piedz\u0113ru\u0161ie zvejnieki (sevi\u0161\u0137i uz t\u0101 fona, ja agr\u0101k b\u016btu ekspon\u0113ts ievad\u0101 min\u0113tais materi\u0101ls, ka salinieki dz\u0113ru\u0161i maz vai nemaz! Tas b\u016btu gana pretrun\u012bgi, t\u0101tad dramatiski pat t\u0101dos, liktos, s\u012bkumos \u2013 bet ja kom\u0113dija \u0161ai \u201etra\u0123i\u201d salikten\u012b, tad, man liekas, ka \u012bsti viet\u0101!) run\u0101 par sve\u0161o sakrop\u013co\u0161anu, k\u0101 jau teikts, b\u016btu der\u012bgi ielikt tai vai cit\u0101 form\u0101 jau agr\u0101k, un tad \u2013 ja ar\u012b \u0161\u012b aina par\u0101d\u012btos tie\u0161i \u0161aj\u0101 viet\u0101, tad k\u0101 v\u0113l viens ritmiski k\u0101pin\u0101ts atg\u0101din\u0101jums \u2013 kas var notikt ar \u201etikumisk\u0101s k\u0101rt\u012bbas p\u0101rk\u0101p\u0113jiem\u201d. Sarun\u0101m j\u0101norit tie\u0161\u0101s valod\u0101s, iesp\u0113jams lieloties, \u0146irdzot, demonstr\u0113joties ar sadistisku nokr\u0101su \u2013 k\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 teiktu: \u201ees \u0146\u0113mu t\u0101s \u0161\u0137\u0113res, k\u0101 \u0161\u0137\u012bda asinis, oh, kaifs!\u201d (nevis sievas, k\u0101 teikts remark\u0101, kam nav \u012bsta attaisnojuma, vai ar\u012b t\u0101ds skaidrojums iztr\u016bkst \u2013 k\u0101p\u0113c tad sievas, ja t\u0101ds ritu\u0101ls \u012bsten\u012bb\u0101 b\u016btu ve\u010du darbs, apstr\u0101d\u0101t konkurentus), kas liktu dom\u0101t par \u0161o tip\u0101\u017eu pa\u0161u psih\u0113 sl\u0113ptaj\u0101m \u0113nu ma\u0161in\u0113rij\u0101m \u2013 zin\u0101ms ta\u010du \u2013 tie\u0161i liel\u0101kie tikum\u012bbas karot\u0101ji sev\u012b nes nepiepild\u012btu attiec\u012bbu l\u0101di\u0146u.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Albert\u012bno un Fabi\u0101no\nn\u0101ko\u0161\u0101 aina ir saprotama.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ar\u012b viss, kas attiecas uz Silvijas un Fabi\u0101no attiec\u012bb\u0101m, gan sl\u0113ptaj\u0101m, gan t\u0101m, kas beig\u0101s par\u0101d\u0101s attiec\u012bb\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n T\u0101pat j\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113\nepizodisko Stellas v\u012bru Martu, kur\u0161 te ir interesants, k\u0101 kontrapunkts \u2013\natz\u012bstot, ka par sievas neuztic\u012bbu vi\u0146am nosp\u013cauties, vair\u0101k vi\u0146\u0161 nor\u016bp\u0113jies\npar politiskiem aspektiem (vai tik jauneklis nav spiegs utt.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Silvijas aina ar\u012b nav\nnesaprotama, tikai maz ticams, ka t\u0101 b\u016btu risin\u0101ma t\u0101das psiholo\u0123ijas monolog\u0101,\njo diez vai gr\u0113k\u0101 kritus\u012b apzin\u012bgi t\u0101 slav\u0113tu sevi par \u201enodar\u012bto\u201d, jo j\u0101\u0146em\nv\u0113r\u0101, k\u0101das \u0113tisko principu soci\u0101los ietvaros, k\u0101d\u0101 stingri norobe\u017eot\u0101\naizliegumu teritorij\u0101 vi\u0146a ir augusi. Maz ticams, ka t\u0101das domas b\u016btu \u0161aj\u0101\nsabiedriskaj\u0101 kopien\u0101 pie\u013caujamas. Es to p\u0101rstr\u0101d\u0101tu vair\u0101k no priek\u0161pl\u0101n\u0101\nizceltas \u201egr\u0113ku no\u017e\u0113lo\u0161anas\u201d viedok\u013ca, kam fon\u0101, tikai fon\u0101 \u2013 par\u0101d\u012btos t\u0101ds k\u0101\napmierin\u0101jums un prieks par paveikto, bet ne jau tik atkl\u0101ti, k\u0101 tagad!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tad ar\u012b lomas\nizpild\u012bt\u0101j\u0101m b\u016btu interesant\u0101k mekl\u0113t risin\u0101jumu \u0161ai ainai. Cit\u0101di \u2013 pie\u013cauju,\nka vi\u0146u pa\u0161u k\u0101 izpild\u012bt\u0101ju cilv\u0113ka psihe pretotos \u201etik neticamai atkl\u0101t\u012bbai\u201d\nun sp\u0113le san\u0101ktu fal\u0161i\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ja tiktu gal\u0101 ar\niepriek\u0161 min\u0113taj\u0101m probl\u0113m\u0101m, tad dom\u0101jams, t\u0101l\u0101kie risin\u0101jumi b\u016btu sav\u0101 viet\u0101\nun fin\u0101ls ar\u012b b\u016btu skaidr\u0101k izv\u0113rsts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Vien\u012bgi, kas noteikti b\u016btu j\u0101dara \u2013 tas ir Silvijas t\u0113va uzn\u0101ciens, vi\u0146a dialogs ar meitu un vi\u0146a personiski izteikti draudi Fabi\u0101no. No \u0161o draudu t\u016bl\u012bt\u0113jas piepild\u012b\u0161anas vi\u0146u attur\u0113tu fakts, ka uzbrukuma objekts tom\u0113r ir \u201eaugstdzimu\u0161ais\u201d – to b\u016btu dialog\u0101 j\u0101dod saprast, ja ne tie\u0161\u0101 tekst\u0101, tad m\u0101jienos- vai ar\u012b risin\u0101t t\u0101, ka vi\u0146\u0161 tas T\u0113vs tikai mutes palai\u0161an\u0101 un draud\u0113\u0161an\u0101 ir tik \u201evarens\u201d, nek\u0101 dar\u012b\u0161an\u0101 \u2013 te vi\u0146am vajadz\u012bgs citu \u201elin\u010dot\u0101ju\u201d atbalsts un fiziska piepal\u012bdz\u0113\u0161ana, jo \u201ekas tos aristokr\u0101tus zina, varb\u016bt izvilks zobenu un nodurs pa\u0161u t\u0113vu\u201d\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Iesp\u0113jams \u0161o Silvijas\nT\u0113vu b\u016btu j\u0101ekspon\u0113 jau agr\u0101k un j\u0101par\u0101da, k\u0101 dzel\u017eainu tikum\u012bbas aizst\u0101vi un\nkas zina \u2013 slepkavo\u0161anas un sakrop\u013co\u0161anas ritu\u0101lu vad\u012bt\u0101ju vai vismaz\niedvesmot\u0101ju. \u0160\u0101ds ekspoz\u012bcijas materi\u0101ls v\u0113l\u0101k dotu nepiecie\u0161amo ener\u0123iju\nfin\u0101la ain\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n B\u016btu j\u0101izdom\u0101, k\u0101 dramatur\u0123iskiem l\u012bdzek\u013ciem atrisin\u0101t \u0161o tikai remark\u0101 iet\u0113loto ainu: (Silvija raud\u0101dama skrien p\u0101ri p\u013cavai uz m\u0101c\u012bt\u0101ja m\u0101ju \u2013 gr\u0113kus izs\u016bdz\u0113t, mierin\u0101jumu rast. Fabi\u0101no, pabeidzis dar\u0101mo, dodas aug\u0161st\u0101v\u0101 p\u0101rlaist nakti zem krodzinieces jumta<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bez tam \u2013 vai tas\nb\u016btu pietiekams atrisin\u0101jums Silvijas l\u012bnijai? Tik vien k\u0101 aiziet pie m\u0101c\u012bt\u0101ja\ngr\u0113kus izs\u016bdz\u0113t\u2026 Vai ar to pietiek?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Vai Silvijas t\u0113vam ar\nto pietiks?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Vai vi\u0146u t\u0101l\u0101kaj\u0101m\ndz\u012bv\u0113m ar to b\u016bs diezgan?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Es mekl\u0113tu interesant\u0101kus risin\u0101jumus fin\u0101lam. Jo tie\u0161i fin\u0101l\u0101 jau ar\u012b j\u0101b\u016bt skaidram: par ko tad ir \u0161\u012b luga. Vai tikai par libido problem\u0101tiku? Vai par v\u0113sturisko atskatu \u2013 re, k\u0101 toreiz bija! Vai t\u0101?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Person\u012bgi mani visvair\u0101k interes\u0113tu tekst\u0101 izv\u0113rstie soci\u0101li liekul\u012bgie uzst\u0101d\u012bjumi, k\u0101 ievad\u0101 teikts skat, cit\u0101ts: \u201eZ\u0101dz\u012bbas vai slepkav\u012bbas Ro\u0146u sal\u0101 nepazina. Latvie\u0161i k\u0101 joku st\u0101st\u012bja le\u0123endu, ka reiz k\u0101ds ro\u0146salietis kaimi\u0146am nozadzis vistu, bet jau n\u0101kamaj\u0101 dien\u0101, sirdsapzi\u0146as moc\u012bts, pak\u0101ries.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Un t\u0101dam stingram un\nes pat teiktu \u2013 k\u0101 m\u0101c\u012bt\u0101ja un pagasttiesas apliecin\u0101tam \u0113tisko normu\nuzst\u0101d\u012bjumam pretstat\u0101 \u2013 realit\u0101t\u0113 iepretim tad novietotos, kaut kas cits: gan\nsve\u0161inieku ritu\u0101l\u0101 sakrop\u013co\u0161ana, gan nepiecie\u0161am\u0101 \u0161ausmu atmosf\u0113ra: kas notiks,\nja gr\u0113kosi, gan fin\u0101l\u0101 Fabi\u0101no noslepkavo\u0161ana. Tad runa b\u016btu par visos laikos\naktu\u0101laj\u0101m nesaska\u0146\u0101m starp to, kas tiek sabiedriskaj\u0101 vid\u0113 pla\u0161i propagand\u0113ts\nun to k\u0101das paral\u0113las v\u0113rt\u012bbas un visp\u0101r \u201eviltus v\u0113rt\u012bbas\u201d patie\u0161\u0101m valda vien\u0101\nvai otr\u0101 sabiedr\u012bb\u0101\u2026 <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0160o j\u0113dzienisko sl\u0101ni\ngan var no materi\u0101la implic\u012bti nolas\u012bt, tom\u0113r iesp\u0113jams, ka autors min\u0113tos\nm\u0113r\u0137us nav st\u0101d\u012bjis. <\/p>\n\n\n\n T\u0101tad \u2013 p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101 piez\u012bme b\u016btu tikai mana interpret\u0101cija.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Andris Zeibots, 2019.g. septembr\u012b. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Kopum\u0101 luga ir interesanta un to b\u016btu der\u012bgi iestud\u0113t, ja skatuviskas iedz\u012bvin\u0101\u0161anas gait\u0101 vis\u0101m \u0161aj\u0101 m\u0101kslinieciskaj\u0101 projekt\u0101 iesaist\u012btaj\u0101m person\u0101m izdotos atrisin\u0101t vair\u0101kus neskaidrus jaut\u0101jumus, kurus t\u0101l\u0101k iez\u012bm\u0113\u0161u, k\u0101 problem\u0101tiskus, bet neb\u016bt ne t\u0101dus, kas r\u0101d\u012btos gal\u012bgi neatrisin\u0101mi \u0161\u012b pa\u0161a materi\u0101la robe\u017e\u0101s. Pirmais, par ko man bija j\u0101dom\u0101, tas ir \u017eanra jaut\u0101jums \u2013 psiholo\u0123iskai tra\u0123ikom\u0113dijai \u0161\u0137iet … <\/p>\n